Preanalytic and analytic factors affecting the measurement of haemoglobin concentration: impact on global estimates of anaemia prevalence

Larson, LM; Braat, S; Hasan, MI; Mwangi, MN; Estepa, F; Hossain, SJ; Clucas, D; Biggs, BA; Phiri, KS; Hamadani, JD; Pasricha, SR

Author(s): Larson, LM; Braat, S; Hasan, MI; Mwangi, MN; Estepa, F; Hossain, SJ; Clucas, D; Biggs, BA; Phiri, KS; Hamadani, JD; Pasricha, SR;
Details: Publication Year 2021-07,Volume 6,Issue #7,Page e005756
Journal Title: BMJ Global Health
Abstract: The accuracy of haemoglobin concentration measurements is crucial for deriving global anaemia prevalence estimates and monitoring anaemia reduction strategies. In this analysis, we examined and quantified the factors affecting preanalytic and analytic variation in haemoglobin concentrations. Using cross-sectional data from three field studies (in children, pregnant and nonpregnant women), we examined the difference in haemoglobin concentration between venous-drawn and capillary-drawn blood measured by HemoCue (ie, preanalytic) and modelled how the bias observed may affect anaemia prevalence estimates in population surveys and anaemia public health severity classification across countries. Using data from an international quality assurance programme, we examined differences due to instrumentation from 16 different haematology analyzers (ie, analytic). Results indicated that capillary and venous haemoglobin concentrations are not in agreement (bias +5.7 g/L (limits of agreement (LoA) -11.2, 22.6) in preschool age children; range from -28 g/L to +20 g/L in pregnant women; bias +8.8 g/L (LoA -5.2, 22.9) in non-pregnant women). The bias observed could introduce changes in population survey estimates of anaemia of up to -20.7 percentage points in children and -28.2 percentage points in non-pregnant women after venous adjustment. Analytic variation was minimal and unlikely to influence the diagnosis of anaemia. These findings suggest that global estimates of anaemia prevalence derived from capillary haemoglobin, as they often are, may be inaccurate and lead to erroneous public health severity classification, but that point-of-care, or other, instruments should not introduce variation if properly used.
Publisher: BMJ
Keywords: *anaemia; *diagnostics and tools
Research Division(s): Population Health And Immunity
PubMed ID: 34330759
Publisher's Version: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005756
Open Access at Publisher's Site: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005756
Terms of Use/Rights Notice: Refer to copyright notice on published article.

Creation Date: 2021-08-16 10:40:45

Last Modified: 2021-08-16 11:12:48